ABSTRACT
BackgroundSheffield Teaching Hospitals (STH), UK, has a specialised axial spondyloarthropathy (axSpa) clinic run by a rheumatology consultant and physiotherapist with special interest in this area. BASDAI and BASFI patient reported outcome measures are used to assess disease activity and response to treatment, in line with national guidelines. STH has invested in MyPathway (MP), an electronic patient messaging system used for patient information, appointments and electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs). The data can also be viewed at a system level on a clinician dashboard. Prior to 2020 the uptake of ePROMs was low in the axSpa clinic. The move primarily to telephone consultations in March 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, created an opportunity for increasing the use of MP for ePROMs collection to enable improved remote monitoring of patients with axSpa.ObjectivesThis quality improvement project aimed to increase the use of electronic BASDAI and BASFI (ePROMs) in the axSpa clinic.MethodsA multi-pronged approach has been taken since March 2020 to increase ePROMs completion and improve their use. Each appointment was used as an opportunity to discuss and recruit patients to MP. Clinicians invited each patient to join MP and sent them a link after their appointment. QR codes were then added to all rheumatology patient letters encouraging patients to register. A pathway was set up that automatically sent a prompt to patients registered on MP to complete their BASDAI and BASFI questionnaires prior to clinic appointments. Clinicians began logging into MP to view scores during appointments to provide patients with real-time feedback.A mixed methods approach was used to assess the uptake of ePROMs over time. We tracked MP registration rates and BASDAI completion rates as the key outcome measures, using a run chart to assess special cause variation. We undertook a patient focus group to explore attitudes towards ePROMs, key barriers and opportunities for further improvement.ResultsThe total number of axSpa patients seen in the specialised clinic (named LADAS) who have registered with MP has increased from 56 (35.9%) in January 2019 to 200 (58.9%) in September 2022. There has been an improvement in the BASDAI completion rate, with 80% of patients completing more than one BASDAI in 2022, compared to 24% in 2019, as illustrated on a run chart (Figure 1). Patients can complete BASDAI forms sent to them in a previous month, therefore the completion rate some months exceeds 100%.In a dedicated focus group, patients reported that ePROMs were generally more convenient, and provided a useful record to refer back to. This could be further improved by development of a graph function to view scores over-time and the ability for patients to complete a questionnaire between appointments when they feel their disease is more active. A key theme for improving the use of ePROMs was the need for more discussion about their utility and around individual patient's scores. There is concern that the BASDAI and BASFI scores are arbitrary and lack nuance, and that the importance of these scores at an individual patient level is not clear. This may be rectified by more discussion with clinicians in appointments, to add meaning to these scores. There was also concern that sleep and other generic health measures are not covered in the BASDAI or BASFI. The EQ-5D, a generic questionnaire, is also sent to axSpa patients, but there seems to be a lack of patient awareness regarding it. There is an appetite to improve and standardise the amount of patient information accessible on MP, for example disease information and links to patient support groups.ConclusionThere has been a clear improvement in the completion of ePROMs in the dedicated axSpa clinic at STH, over the last three years. Patient feedback has highlighted key areas for further improvement to maximise the potential of ePROMs, including more discussion around PROM scores to increase understanding and add individual patient meaning and nuance.Figure 1.AcknowledgementsI have no acknowledgements to declare.Disclosure of InterestsJudith Jade: None declared, Zoe Cox: None declared, Emily Fox: None declared, Rachel Tattersall Speakers bureau: honoraria as speaker for Abbvie, Lisa Dunkley Speakers bureau: honoraria as speaker/ teaching for UCB/ Abbvie/ Pfizer.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic caused concerns whether patients with rheumatic musculoskeletal disease (RMD) treated with conventional (cs) or biologic (b) disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) and/or prednisolone exhibit an adequate immune response to the applied SARS-CoV2 vaccines.ObjectivesWe established the DECODIR study to assess and compare the efficacy of the SARS-CoV2 vaccines administered as part of the national vaccine roll-out: BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna). The vaccines were offered as two doses four weeks apart;followed by a booster vaccination six months later. This national regimen included inflammatory rheumatic patients regardless of their respective anti-inflammatory treatment. We used patients' SARS-CoV2 IgG serum level as proxy for vaccination response (1).MethodsThe study was conducted as a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthropathies (SpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) receiving their outpatient treatment at the Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Sonderborg, and monitored in the Danish DANBIO registry, were included.Blood samples, Disease activity and treatment information (cs/bDMARD, prednisolone) were collected at baseline (i.e. prior to vaccination), after six weeks, six and twelve months. SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels in serum were assessed by ELISA (Thermo-Fischer), and manufacturer's cut-off (>=10 EliA U/mL) selected as definition of sufficient IgG response. Antibody response was measured and compared at all four time points.Associations between antibody response, age, gender, disease (RA/PsA/SpA), treatment (none, cs/bDMARD or prednisolone) and disease activity were tested using proportional odds regression and bootstrapped tests of medians. Results were reported using mean, median (IqR) and bootstrapped 95% confidence interval (CI) of the median.ResultsA total of 243 patients were included at baseline and all were followed-up after six weeks;data from 233 patients were available at six months and for 229 patients at twelve months' follow-up. Those 229 patients had completed the national vaccination programme.The measurements performed 6 months after baseline demonstrated a per se decrease of IgG levels for the whole study population (median of 2.08 EliA U/mL at 6 months vs. 16 EliA U/mL at 6 weeks). The final measurements performed after twelve months demonstrated a significant increase of IgG levels. Thus, the completed vaccination programme, was followed by a significant increase in IgG levels (median of 100 EliA U/mL at twelve months vs. 16.5 EliA U/mL at six months, p < 0.001).Sufficient response rates were now recorded in all treatment scenarios, also in patients treated with prednisolone or combination of csDMARD and bDMARD. These two groups were at 6 months characterized by significant lower response rates, when compared with patients without any DMARD treatment.ConclusionCompleted vaccination programme defined as two doses plus booster vaccination resulted in a sufficient vaccination response as measured by IgG levels regardless of RA treatment.It is noteworthy that IgG levels increased markedly in patients treated with a combination of cs/bDMARD or oral prednisolone, who had low IgG levels (below manufacturer's cut-off >=10 EliA U/mL) after 6 months. Our results strongly support the efficacy of the complete vaccination programme including the 3rd booster vaccine in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.Figure 1.Serum IgG-levels at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months;stratified by antirheumatic treatment. (Box plot showing median and interquartile range).[Figure omitted. See PDF]Reference[1]Schreiber K. et al. Reduced Humoral Response of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies following Vaccination in Patients with Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases— an Interim Report from a Danish Prospective Cohort Study. Vaccines 2022, 10(1), 35;https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10010035AcknowledgementsWe acknowledge all patients contributing to the DANBIO registry.The Danish Rheumatologic Biobank is a knowledged for handling and storage of biological material.Lab chieftechnician Charlotte Drachmann is acknowledged for her assistance.Disclosure of InterestsChristine Graversgaard: None declared, Karen Schreiber Speakers bureau: Lilly, UCB, Henning Jakobsen: None declared, Randi Petersen: None declared, Anders Bo Bojesen: None declared, Niels Steen Krogh: None declared, Bente Glintborg Grant/research support from: Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Sandoz, Merete Lund Hetland: None declared, Oliver Hendricks Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundPatients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) under moderate/severe immunosuppression are considered a high-risk population to develop severe Covid-19 infection.ObjectivesThe aim of our study was to describe the clinical characteristics and the outcome of patients with ARD who contracted a Sars-Cov-2 infection.MethodsAmong patients with ARD being followed in our tertiary outpatient rheumatology clinic, we retrospectively identified those infected with SARS-CoV-2 between the beginning of the pandemic and August 2022. Patients' medical files were reviewed for demographics (age, gender and comorbidities) and disease-related characteristics, as well as coronavirus disease (COVID-19) characteristics, including vaccination status, treatment, and outcomes (covid-19 severity, hospitalization, death).ResultsA total of 209 cases of ARD patients with confirmed Covid-19 infection were recorded. Most of them were women (62.7%), with a mean age of 52.4± 13.8 years. The most prevalent ARDs were seronegative spondyloarthropathies (28.7%), systematic lupus erythematosus (21.5%), rheumatoid arthritis (16.5%), and systemic sclerosis (11.5%). More than half of the patients received corticosteroids (57.8%), while the most frequently used immunosuppressants were hydroxychloroquine (30.9%), TNF inhibitors (26.5%), mycophenolate mofetil (24.0%), methotrexate (19.1%) and rituximab (15.2%). One hundred and fifty-eight (76%) patients were either on remission or had mild disease activity. Most of the patients (131/209) had at least one comorbidity, more commonly arterial hypertension (48.5%) and pulmonary disease (45.2%). Most of the patients were vaccinated against Sars-Cov-2 (73.7%), either with two doses (38.0%), three doses (57.0%) or four doses (5.0%) of mRNA-based vaccines. The big majority of the patients (83.3%) were asymptomatic or had mild Covid-19 disease. About half of the patients (53.1%) reported to have received Covid-19 treatment. Thirty-two of them (15.3%) needed hospitalization, and five death cases were reported overall. Among the demographic characteristics, age (p<0.0001 for hospitalization) and comorbidities were associated with worse covid-19 outcomes. In particular, cardiovascular disease (OR 5.37, p=0.001 for covid-19 severity, OR 6.89, p=0.001 for hospitalization), pulmonary disease (OR 3.02, p=0.006 for hospitalization), and obesity (OR 3.46, p=0.044 for hospitalization) had the stronger associations. Non-vaccination status was also associated with a higher risk for hospitalization (OR 2.68, p=0.015). In relation to ARD-related factors, treatment with rituximab (OR 4.11, p=0.002 for hospitalization), systemic sclerosis diagnosis (OR 3.45, p=0.03 for Covid-19 severity) and myositis diagnosis (OR 4.91, p=0.033 for hospitalization) were associated with worse Covid-19 outcomes. On the other hand, spondyloarthropathies appear to be negatively associated with Covid-19 severity (OR=0.27, p=0.035).ConclusionAccording to our study, most ARD patients recovered uneventfully from Covid-19. However, there are several indications that we should be vigilant for patients who remain unvaccinated, are older, have a systemic sclerosis or myositis diagnosis, and/or receive intense immunosuppressive regiments such as rituximab.References[1]Papagoras C, Fragoulis GE, et al. Better outcomes of COVID-19 in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Nov 10.[2]Strangfeld A, Schäfer M, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death in people with rheumatic diseases: results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jul;80(7):930-942.Table 1.N=209ARD Diagnosisn (%)Rheumatoid arthritis34 (16.3)Seronegative spondyloarthropathies60 (28.7)Systemic lupus erythematosus45 (21.5)Systemic sclerosis24 (11.5)Sjogren's syndrome15 (7.2)Vasculitis19 (9.1)Myositis9 (4.3)Other3 (1.4)Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundData on cellular and humoral immunogenicity triggered by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) are limited. While current vaccine efforts have focused on the induction of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, T-cell immunity may also provide protection against infection. Experimental data suggest that CD8+ T cell responses may have a protective role in the presence of decreasing or sub protective antibody titers [1].ObjectivesThe aim of this project is to describe the serological and T cell responses to the third dose of vaccine (either with BNT162b2 mRNA or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 replication-deficient adenoviral vector vaccines) in a cohort of patients with ARDs (rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathies) treated with biologic therapies, to describe the impact of these treatments on vaccine response in this patient population. As a second objective, we will describe the characteristics of patients who did not present an adequate immunogenic response.MethodsCase-control study. We studied in 79 patients with ARDs and in 31 healthy controls, anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production measured by IGRA between 8-12 weeks after the third dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. In addition, humoral response was measured by anti-S1 IgG antibody production measured by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. Statistical comparison between categorical variables was performed by Fisher's or χ2 test. For quantitative variables by Kruskal-Wallis test or Mann-Whitney test.Results79 patients with ARDs (48 women, 31 men;mean age 58±11.4) 43 (54%), with rheumatoid arthritis and 36 (45.6%) with spondyloarthropathies. 32 (49.5%) of them were on glucocorticoid treatment (mean dose 4.92 mg/day), 25 (31.6%) on methotrexate and 56 (70.9%) on anti-TNF. Post-vaccination results showed positive T-cell immune responses in 68 of 79 (86.1%) ARDs patients with mean IFN- γ anti-SARS-CoV-2 titers of 1,606.85 mUI/ml. 7 (8.9%) of ARDs patients showed negative IFN-γ SARS-CoV-2 levels, while 4 (5%) had borderline titers. 100% of patients with previous COVID 19 disease had positive cellular responses. Within the group of negative or borderline cellular responses, 7 of 10 were men (70%), with no significant differences in terms of diagnosis, comorbidities or immunosuppressive treatments used. In the control group, 100% presented positive cellular responses. Anti-Spike IgG antibodies were detectable in all patients with ARDs as in the control group.ConclusionOur preliminary data show that most patients with ARD were able to generate an adequate specific cellular response after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, emphasizing the relevance of vaccination in this group. Specific antibody responses secondary to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were detected in all patients with ARD. Our data could support the relevance of these immune responses to personalize prevention, vaccination decision-making and treatment in this subgroup of patients.References[1]Sieiro Santos C, Calleja Antolin S, Moriano Morales C, Garcia Herrero J, Diez Alvarez E, Ramos Ortega F, et al. Immune responses to mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases. RMD Open. 2022 Jan 5;8(1).Figure 1.Specific anti-SARS-CoV-2-IFN- γ responses measured by IGRA. Dotted lines represent positivity cut-off: ≥200mUI/ml. HC: Healthy controls. AIRDs: Autoimmune rheumatic diseases.[Figure omitted. See PDF]Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundD-dimer and fibrinogen elevation has been observed in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection which is associated with higher incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and higher mortality rates. [1-3]. Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases (ARDs) are associated with higher rates of VTE compared to general population [4]. Whether patients with ARDs infected with SARS-CoV2 have similar D-dimer and fibrinogen trends compared to patients without ARDs is unknown.ObjectivesCompare D-dimer and fibrinogen levels in patients with ARDs infected with SARS-CoV2 to patients without ARDs.MethodsPatients with ARDs infected with SARS-CoV2 were identified retrospectively from the electronic medical records (EMR) of Hamad Medical Corporation and matched (age and sex) to controls (1:3). D-dimer and fibrinogen levels were extracted electronically from EMR and stratified into six-time intervals defined in table 1. Day 0 was defined as the date of positive nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction swab test. 2 Independent Samples test (Mann-Whitney U) was used to compare the median (25th - 75th interquartile range [IQR]) level of D-dimer and fibrinogen between both study groups at the defined intervals.ResultsThe study included 203 cases and 551 controls with a mean (SD) age of 45.3 (11.7) and 44 (12.5) years, females were (122 [60.1%] vs. 297 [53.9%], p = 0.129), respectively.Distribution of ARDs was rheumatoid arthritis 86 (42.4%), spondyloarthropathy 33 (16.1%) and systemic lupus erythematosus 31 (15.7%) cases. 67% were on conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (Cs-DMARDs), 15.8% on biological DMARDs and 4.9% on rituximab. About 83% of the ARDs group were in remission or low disease activity and 13% were in moderate or high disease activity.The median (25th - 75th IQR) level of D-dimer and fibrinogen were comparable between study groups in all defined intervals with insignificant p values except at interval 4, fibrinogen was significantly higher in the cases, p 0.006. Table 1ConclusionThere was no significant difference in the trend of D-dimer and fibrinogen levels during SARS-CoV2 infection between patients with ARDs and those without ARDs. Additional studies are needed to quantify the actual risk of VTE in patients with ARDs during SARS-CoV2 in correlation with serum markers of VTE.References[1]Eljilany I, Elzouki AN. D-Dimer, Fibrinogen, and IL-6 in COVID-19 Patients with Suspected Venous Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2020;16:455-62.[2]Li JY, Wang HF, Yin P, Li D, Wang DL, Peng P, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A multicenter retrospective study. J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19(4):1038-48.[3]Zhan H, Chen H, Liu C, Cheng L, Yan S, Li H, et al. Diagnostic Value of D-Dimer in COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021;27:10760296211010976.[4]Lee JJ, Pope JE. A meta-analysis of the risk of venous thromboembolism in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(5):435.Table 1.Differences in D-dimer and fibrinogen during SARS-CoV2 infection between patients with ARDs and those without at the defined intervals.Case N = 203Control N = 551P valueMedian (25th - 75th IQR), D-dimer (mg/L)(0 to < 3 days)0.56 (0.34 – 1.31)0.86 (0.54 – 1.41)0.096(≤ 3 to < 6 days)0.67 (0.35 – 2.58)1.11 (0.44 – 1.11)0.340(≤ 6 to < 9 days)0.81 (0.33 – 5.12)1.12 (0.56 – 3.28)0.299(≤ 9 to 12 days)0.94 (0.72 – 5.44)5.20 (1.0 – 15.05)0.058(≤ 12 to < 15 days)2.88 (0.72 – 5.53)4.96 (0.57 – 9.98)0.681(≤ 15 to 18 days)1.81 (0.89 – 2.55)5.56 (2.60 – 15.1)0.086Median (25th – 75th IQR), fibrinogen (mg/L)(0 to < 3 days)6.53 (2.0 - 6.53)5.65 (3.75 – 7.17)1.000(≤ 3 to < 6 days)6.25 (3.72 – 8.3)4.6 (4.1 – 5.6)0.385(≤ 6 to < 9 days)3.53 (3.29 – 4.62)3.4 (3.2 – 3.92)0.328(≤ 9 to 12 days)4.3 (2.82 – 4.78)2.2 (1.65 – 3.05)0.006(≤ 12 to < 15 days)4.4 (2.37 – 5.13)3.1 (1.7 – 4.45)0.170(≤ 15 to 18 days)3.6 ( – 5.7)3.7 (2.0 – 4.88)0.524Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the SARS-CoV- 2 infection rate among vaccinated RMD patients in a tertiary hospital and its associations. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was performed among adult rheumatology patients who attended follow up at our centre from 1st April 2022 to 30th April 2022. Demographics and clinical data were compared between the vaccinated patients with SARS-CoV- 2 infection, Group 1 (G1) and without SARS-CoV- 2 infection, Group 2 (G2). Descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted using SPSS version 26. Result(s): We enrolled a total of 212 patients with underlying diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (94 patients, 44.3%), systemic lupus erythematosus (59 patients, 27.8%), spondyloarthropathies (30 patients, 14.2%) and others (29 patients, 13.7%). Of all these patients, 57 (26.9%) had SARS-CoV- 2 infection (G1) with mean (SD) age of 45.2 (+/-14.65) years compared to 53.4 (+/-15.22) years in G2 (P = 0.001). In G1, 50 (87.7%) were female, 32 (56.1%) were Malay and 26 (45.6%) with >= 1 comorbidity. Most patients in G1 received 3 doses of vaccine (n = 36, 63.2%) while 21 (36.8%) completed 2 doses of vaccine. Majority in G1 (n = 46, 80.7%) had clinical stage 2 SARS-CoV- 2 infection. Seven required admission to health care facilities with median stay of 6 +/- 2 days. Twenty-three patients (32.9%) in G1 received more than one immunosuppressive drug. Twenty-one out of 63 patients (33.3%) who had 2 doses of SARS-CoV- 2 vaccine had SARS-CoV- 2 infection compared to 36 out of 149 patients (24.2%) who received 3 doses of vaccine, albeit not significant. Conclusion(s): Despite a quarter of the cohort acquired SARS-CoV- 2 infection, the disease was notably less severe, attributed to younger age, less comorbidity and vaccine effectiveness. Type of immunosuppression and use of more than one immunosuppressive drugs were not associated with SARS-CoV- 2 infection.
ABSTRACT
Case report - Introduction: This is the case of an adolescent referred to rheumatology following 5 years of back pain. After years of trying a number of treatments without much success, the cause was found to be a previously undiagnosed urological pathology. The case highlights awareness of non-rheumatological causes and incidental findings which can redirect a patient towards more appropriate treatment and reduce the potential for long-term adverse health issues and anxiety. Case report - Case description: B was referred age 16 to rheumatology with a 5-year history of lower back pain. She had previously seen paediatricians with symptoms initially attributed to constipation due to intermittent straining and hard stool. However, constipation remedies had not relieved the pain which progressed gradually to a more persistent dull ache with impact on daily activities. Various analgesics (including paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories), exercises and acupuncture had not helped. There was no history of recurrent urinary tract infections or symptom correlation with fluid intake, menstruation or bowel habit. No inflammatory features or connective tissue disease symptoms were noted and family history was unremarkable Clinical examination was normal apart from mild tenderness in the lumbar region. Rheumatoid factor was borderline positive (15 iu/mL) with the rest of blood tests normal including renal function, inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR), anti CCP and ANA. She had minimal microscopic haematuria without proteinuria. MRI spine in 2015 was normal. In view of her young age and symptoms affecting daily activities, STIR sequence spinal MRI was requested. This excluded any new or old inflammatory changes but incidentally identified a dilated left pelvi-calyceal system. Renal ultrasound confirmed a grossly hydronephrotic left kidney with hydroureter and minimal renal tissue suggesting longstanding obstruction. No calculi were seen. The patient was referred to urologists. Further investigations (including MRI abdomen) confirmed similar findings and a distal ureteric stricture. A MAG 3 renogram showed a normal right kidney but only 12% functioning of the left kidney. Urologists have advised surgery (removal of left kidney and ureter) which may relieve symptoms or a conservative non-surgical approach (continue analgesia, physiotherapy and monitoring). The patient and her family are relieved to have a possible cause identified and are considering the surgical option due to ongoing flank discomfort. Case report - Discussion: This was an interesting finding of hydroureter and hydronephrosis causing longstanding back pain presenting to rheumatologists. Until completion of the spondyloarthropathy protocol MRI (STIR images), aetiology had been unclear. Hydronephrosis and hydroureter has no specific age or racial predilection. Signs and symptoms may depend on whether obstruction is acute/chronic. Chronic cases may be asymptomatic or present as a dull discomfort (like this case). Some cases may only present in adulthood with pain precipitated by fluid intake. Blood tests may show impaired kidney function. Post-mortem studies suggest 50% of people have at least one renal abnormality (e.g., renal cysts, duplex ureters) with autopsy series incidence of hydronephrosis reported as 3.1%. Causes include anatomical abnormalities such as vesico-ureteric reflux, urethral strictures (usually present in childhood), calculi, benign prostatic hyperplasia, or intrapelvic neoplasms, pregnancy and infections (e.g., TB). Sudden onset unilateral renomegaly was reported in one case of primary Sjogren's with lymphocytic interstitial nephritis and positive Sjogren's autoantibodies. Our patient has no clinical or serological evidence of connective tissue disease. Minor pelvi-calyceal distension can occur as a normal finding in wellhydrated patients and pregnancy. However, significant hydronephrosis requires assessment to determine cause as it may affect long term renal function. Imaging via computed tomography, ultrasound and urograms can help guide further management. In this case the preceding cause and duration of pathology is unknown. Sterile, giant hydronephrosis treatment options include observation and ureteric stent or nephrostomy in patients unfit for surgery. Nephrectomy is advised for pain and recurrent infection in a non-functioning kidney. Complications may include bowel perforation, vascular injury and urine leakage. Both open and minimally invasive procedures have good reported outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic and exams have affected timing of any elective procedures and the patient understands surgery may or may not offer complete symptom resolution. Case report - Key learning points: . Non-inflammatory causes of back pain should always be considered in cases of persistent back pain, particularly in young people to ascertain if there is a treatable cause . Hydronephrosis cases can be asymptomatic or present with vague, intermittent, non-specific abdominal symptoms with normal physical examination with or without haematuria. This can cause diagnostic uncertainty and delay referral to urology and appropriate renal investigations . Assessment of renal function (including MAG 3 renogram) is important to guide further management . Surgical interventions (pyeloplasty/nephrectomy) may ease symptoms long term but there is no guarantee of a successful outcome and operative risks need to be considered too . Left undiagnosed, potentially this patient could have had further disruption to daily activities and both physical and mental well being.
ABSTRACT
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load and its impact on disease outcome in patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD) are lacking. Also, whether patients with ARD receiving immunomodulators have different viral loads compared to the general population is unknown. Objectives: To compare the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 and its trending between patients without and with ARD. Methods: Retrospectively, patients with ARD infected with SARS-CoV-2 were matched by age and sex at a ratio of 1:2 to patients without ARD and not receiving immunosuppression or immunomodulator drugs. Viral load was determined by the cycle threshold (CT) value measured by a number of platforms: (a) Automated Platforms-the Roche Cobas 6800 system using the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test targeting the E and orf1a/b genes (Roche, Switzerland) and the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 targeting the E and N genes (Cepheid, USA);(b) Manual platforms-EZ1 (QIAGEN, USA), QIAsymphony (QIAGEN, USA), and Bioneer ExiPrepTM 96 Virus DNA/RNA kits Catalogue No K4614 (Bioneer, South Korea) extraction with thermal cycling using TaqPath™ PCR COVID-19 Combo Kit targeting the N, S and orf1a/b genes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) on ABI 7500 thermal cyclers. Independent samples t-test was used to compare the mean CT values of the study groups at baseline and at 5 subsequent intervals (1-5.9, 6-11.9, 12-17.9, 18-23.9 and 24-30 days). Results: Mean age (SD) of 197 cases and 420 controls were 45.2 (11.8) and 44.1 (12.3) years, respectively. Females were predominant in both groups 60% vs. 52%, P=0.053. The most common ARD was rheumatoid arthritis in 82 cases (41.6%), followed by spondyloarthropathy in 33 (16.8%) and systemic lupus ery-thematosus in 31 (15.7%). Of the cases, 67% were on conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), 15.2% on biological DMARDs and 4.6% patients were on rituximab. The mean CT values was signifcantly lower in the ARD group at baseline and persisted till day 24. Conclusion: Compared to patients without ARD, the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with ARD is signifcantly higher at baseline testing and persists till day 24. This fnding may indicate that patients with ARD are at higher risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and prolonged potential transmission. Clinical outcome correlation is needed.
ABSTRACT
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load and its impact on disease outcome in patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD) are lacking. Also, whether patients with ARD receiving immunomodulators have different viral loads compared to the general population is unknown. Objectives: To compare the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 and its trending between patients without and with ARD. Methods: Retrospectively, patients with ARD infected with SARS-CoV-2 were matched by age and sex at a ratio of 1:2 to patients without ARD and not receiving immunosuppression or immunomodulator drugs. Viral load was determined by the cycle threshold (CT) value measured by a number of platforms: (a) Automated Platforms-the Roche Cobas 6800 system using the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test targeting the E and orf1a/b genes (Roche, Switzerland) and the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 targeting the E and N genes (Cepheid, USA);(b) Manual platforms-EZ1 (QIAGEN, USA), QIAsymphony (QIAGEN, USA), and Bioneer ExiPrepTM 96 Virus DNA/RNA kits Catalogue No K4614 (Bioneer, South Korea) extraction with thermal cycling using TaqPath™ PCR COVID-19 Combo Kit targeting the N, S and orf1a/b genes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) on ABI 7500 thermal cyclers. Independent samples t-test was used to compare the mean CT values of the study groups at baseline and at 5 subsequent intervals (1-5.9, 6-11.9, 12-17.9, 18-23.9 and 24-30 days). Results: Mean age (SD) of 197 cases and 420 controls were 45.2 (11.8) and 44.1 (12.3) years, respectively. Females were predominant in both groups 60% vs. 52%, P=0.053. The most common ARD was rheumatoid arthritis in 82 cases (41.6%), followed by spondyloarthropathy in 33 (16.8%) and systemic lupus ery-thematosus in 31 (15.7%). Of the cases, 67% were on conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), 15.2% on biological DMARDs and 4.6% patients were on rituximab. The mean CT values was signifcantly lower in the ARD group at baseline and persisted till day 24. Conclusion: Compared to patients without ARD, the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with ARD is signifcantly higher at baseline testing and persists till day 24. This fnding may indicate that patients with ARD are at higher risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and prolonged potential transmission. Clinical outcome correlation is needed.
ABSTRACT
Background: South East Asia was one of the frst regions affected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus causing COVID-19 however data on the impact of COVID-19 infection in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases (SRD) in South East Asia remains scarce. Objectives: To evaluate basic demographics, clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 infection in patients with SRD from a tertiary rheumatology centre in West Malaysia. Methods: A retrospective observational study of 77 patients with SRD diagnosed with COVID-19 between 1st December 2020 to the 31st of December 2021 was performed. Demographic details, type of SRD, number and type of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), dose of glucocorticoid, comorbidities, SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (type and number of doses) hospitalisation, oxygen requirement, type of COVID-19 related complication and death were recorded. Results: A total of 55 (71%) patients were hospitalised and 9 (12%) died. Mean age at time of COVID-19 diagnosis was 51 ± 14. Amongst these patients, 32 (42%) were Chinese, 30 (39%) Malays and 15 (19%) Indians. Majority of these patients had infammatory arthritis (58%) which included rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative spondyloarthropathy. The most common DMARDs used was meth-otrexate (51%), hydroxychloroquine (46%), sulfasalazine (22%), lefunomide (13%), azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil (5% each). Two patients were on Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors and 3 on biologic DMARDS (tumour necrosis factor inhibitor, IL-6 inhibitors and IL-17 inhibitors). There were 38 patients (49%) vaccinated with two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Pfzer n=29, CoronoVac n=7 and AstraZeneca n=2) prior to admission and amongst those unvaccinated, 15 (20%) contracted COVID-19 before the vaccine was released in Malaysia. Among hospitalised patients, those more than 60 years and those with more than one comorbid had a higher chance of admission (n= 21, 88%;p=0.036 and n=28, 88%;p=0.001) and death (n=8, 33%;p<0.001 and n=7, 22%;p<0.001). Comorbidities associated with higher risk of hospitalisation was diabetes mel-litus (85%, p=0.06), hypertension (92%, p<0.001) and coronary artery disease (100%, p=0.03) and those associated with death was obesity (33%, p=0.01) and hypertension (22%, p=0.007). Use of conventional DMARD, JAK, biologics and glucocorticoid were not associated with hospitalisation or morbidity. However, we found that patients who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to COVID-19 were mostly on sulfasalazine compared to other DMARDS (35%, p=0.01). Conclusion: In our multiethnic cohort of patients with SRD we found that age and multiple comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity and coronary artery disease were associated with hospitalisation and morbidity. Disease activity and glucocorticoid use which have been shown to be associated with morbidity [1] was not seen in our cohort. The association between sulfasala-zine and poor outcomes have been reported [2] however further studies are still needed to investigate the causal relationship between the two.
ABSTRACT
Background and importance Patients with immune-mediated diseases (IMIDs) frequently need therapies from the hospital pharmacy. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a home delivery service (HDS) with telepharmacy follow-up was started to avoid unnecessary visits to hospital. Aim and objectives To describe the population that accepted the HDS and evaluate their satisfaction about it. Material and methods Descriptive retrospective observational study in a cohort of patients with IMIDs who had received HDS from February to August 2021. Data collected were age, sex, pathology, distance to hospital, number of shipments and satisfaction survey score. Surveys were made by telephone and scored the Pharmacy Service, the transport company and global satisfaction by means of seven questions (each with scores ranging from 1 to 5). Results 130 patients received HDS (7.23% of IMIDs outpatients), 116 of them were contacted for the survey. 81.9% were female. Median age was 74 (IQR 65.50-80.00) years. Pathologies distribution: 63 (54.31%) rheumatoid arthritis;18 (15.52%) spondyloarthropathies;14 (12.07%) multiple sclerosis;7 (6.03%) inflammatory bowel disease;5 (4.31%) psoriasis;5 (4.31%) connective tissue diseases and 4 (3.45%) other IMIDs (hydradenitis or vasculitis). 22.41% patients lived outside of the city centre where the hospital is located. Patients received an average of 2.17 (SD 1.12) shipments during these months. 84.48% patients were offered HDS from the hospital pharmacy;15.52% asked for the service themselves. Main reason chosen by patients to accepted HDS was the COVID-19 pandemic situation or self-insolation due to contact or infection (75.86%), followed by mobility difficulties (31.90%), distance to hospital (6.90%) and work schedule (0.86%). Average survey score for Pharmacy Service: 4.93 (SD 0.29) about pharmacist follow-up, 5.00 (SD 0) about correct medication and 4.98 (SD 0.13) about shipping material. In relation to the transport company, the scores were 5.00 (SD 0) about carrier treatment, 4.86 (SD 0.58) about schedule compliance and 5.00 (SD 0) about proper packaging conditions. Average score for global satisfaction was 4.99 (SD 0.10). Conclusion and relevance The pandemic situation increased HDS necessity (75.86% of patients requested it) but its continuity is justified specially due to mobility difficulties (31.90%) in older or incapacitated people, a frequent situation in IMIDs outpatients. Home delivery is a service that is highly valued by patients. Even so, telepharmacy follow-up and trying to adapt the shipping schedule could be areas to improve the service.
ABSTRACT
Case report-IntroductionIn December 2019, the first cluster of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 was identified in Wuhan, China. The disease was declared a global pandemic on 11th March 2020. COVID-19 was initially thought to cause respiratory complications only, however several extra pulmonary manifestations of the infection have since emerged.We report a rare case of reactive arthritis (ReA), urticarial rash and angioedema in a young female secondary to COVID-19 infection. Rashes were recently added to the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria for diagnosis of COVID-19 demonstrating their significance.Case report-Case descriptionA 31-year-old female doctor was admitted with acute swelling of her lips, dysphagia, and a widespread urticarial rash. Preceding this she had a one-week history of fever, cough, and constitutional symptoms of malaise and weight loss. Her symptoms had started at the end of April 2020 during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Three days later she developed painful swelling of her wrists, elbows, knees, and hands. She reported no back or sacroiliac joint pain, enthesitis or any previous history of inflammatory joint pains. She had a history of platelet dysfunction and was treated with Desmopressin.Clinical examination revealed a widespread urticarial rash over her face, limbs, and trunk, with no nail abnormalities. She had active synovitis in her right wrist, elbow, and mild bilateral knee effusions. All other joints including spine and sacroiliac joints were normal. She had no dactylitis or enthesitis. Systemic examination was normal. Investigations revealed Hb 113 g/L, MCV 88.2 fL, Platelets 282 x 109/L, WCC 6.6 x 109/L and Lymphocytes of 0.63 x 109/L with normal neutrophil and eosinophil count. CRP was raised at 107mg/L. She had a negative autoimmune screen including ANA, ANCA, IgM-RF, anti-CCP antibodies and HLA B27. Plain radiographs of knees were normal. SARS CoV-2 PCR was positive following a nasal swab. Urine and blood cultures were negative. Treatment was commenced with intravenous hydrocortisone and antihistamines with resolution of her angioedema symptoms;however, her rash and arthritis persisted.The patient was diagnosed with Reactive Arthritis (ReA), urticarial rash and angioedema secondary to COVID-19 infection. Prednisolone 30mg daily was started, and within a week her arthritis and rash markedly improved. Prednisolone was tapered over six weeks. By her two-month clinic follow up, she reported no further joint swelling and was functioning normally.Case report-DiscussionThe most common complication of COVID-19 is Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) however several other serious complications have been identified including cardiac injury, thromboembolic events, neurological abnormalities, and an aggravated inflammatory response causing a cytokine storm.ReA is a post infectious arthritis commonly seen following gastrointestinal or genitourinary infections and is yet to be recognised as a complication of this disease. ReA most commonly presents as an asymmetrical peripheral or axial spondyloarthropathy. The affected joints do not contain pathogen. More than half of ReA cases resolve spontaneously within six months without requiring long-term treatments.Up to 20% of patients with COVID-19 infection have been shown to develop cutaneous manifestations including erythematous rash, vesicular rash, acral ischaemia, rash with petechiae, and widespread urticaria. This has led to the recent addition of rashes to the World Health Organisation (WHO) Criteria for diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. Additionally, as COVID-19 has an incubation period of 14 days where patients can be asymptomatic, cutaneous manifestations may serve as an early indicator of infection, aiding in a more rapid diagnosis.Case report-Key learning pointsWe present a rare case of ReA secondary to COVID-19 infection, with complete resolution of symptoms following administration of oral glucocorticoids. A detailed history and examination of t e musculoskeletal system should be undertaken in all patients presenting with COVID-19. Urticarial rashes should be considered as an early symptom of COVID-19 infection as per the WHO criteria for diagnosis. Glucocorticoids can be considered in treating patients with this presentation, where traditional anti-inflammatory agents have been refractory or contraindicated.
ABSTRACT
Reactive arthritis (ReA) is a form of inflammatory arthritis triggered by a remote antecedent infection, usually in the genitourinary or gastrointestinal tract. It is part of the spondyloarthropathy (SpA) spectrum, an umbrella term for a group of distinct conditions with shared clinical features. Typically, it presents with an asymmetric oligoarthritis of the lower limb joints, and patients may also have sacroiliitis, enthesitis and dactylitis. Other features often seen include anterior uveitis, urethritis and skin manifestations such as pustular lesions on the plantar areas. Although ReA was characterised initially as a sterile arthritis, the detection of metabolically active Chlamydia species in the joint fluid of some affected patients has generated further questions on the pathophysiology of this condition. There are no formal diagnostic criteria, and the diagnosis is mainly clinical. HLA-B27 can support the diagnosis in the correct clinical context, and serves as a prognostic indicator. The majority of patients have a self-limiting course, but some develop chronic SpA and require immunomodulatory therapy.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Reactive , Arthritis, Reactive/diagnosis , Arthritis, Reactive/etiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Prognosis , ProhibitinsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The treatment for COVID-19 often utilizes immune-modulating drugs. These drugs are also used in immune mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). We performed a systematic review about seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with IMIDs and impact of various drugs on seroconversion rates. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies reporting seroconversion rates following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in IMIDs. We calculated the pooled seroconversion rates after a single or two doses of vaccination, pooled seroconversion rates in patients with specific IMIDs, and rates in patients on various drugs/drug classes. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included in the systematic review. The pooled seroconversion rates after two doses of mRNA vaccination were higher (83.1, 95%CI: 74.9-89.0, I2 = 90%) as compared to a single dose (69.3, 52.4-82.3, I2 = 95%). The odds of seroconversion were lower in IMIDs as compared to healthy controls (0.05, 0.02-0.13, I2 = 21%). The seroconversion rates in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (95.2, 95%CI: 92.6-96.9, I2 = 0%), spondyloarthropathy (95.6, 95% CI: 83.4-98.9, I2 = 35%), and systemic lupus erythematosus (90.7, 95%CI: 85.4-94.2, I2 = 0%) were higher as compared to rheumatoid arthritis (79.5, 95% CI: 65.1-88.9, I2 = 85%), and vasculitis (70.5, 95% CI: 52.9-83.5, I2 = 51%). The seroconversion rates following double dose of mRNA were excellent (>90%) in those on anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF), anti-integrin (vedolizumab), anti-IL 17 (secukinumab), anti-IL6 (Tocilizumab) and anti-IL12/23 (Ustekinumab) therapies but attenuated (<70%) in patients on anti-CD20 (Rituximab) or anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen (CTLA-4) therapies (Abatacept). The seroconversion rates were good (70-90%) with steroids, hydroxychloroquine, JAK inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil and leflunomide. Combination of anti-TNF with immunomodulators (azathioprine, 6-meracptopurine, methotrexate) resulted in an attenuated vaccine response as compared to anti-TNF monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Seroconversion rates after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are lower in patients with IMIDs. Certain therapies (anti-TNF, anti-integrin, anti-IL 17, anti-IL6, anti-12/23) do not impact seroconversion rates while others (anti-CD20, anti-CTLA-4) result in poorer responses.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors , VaccinationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 has substantial morbidity and mortality. We studied whether hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and chronic inflammatory diseases experienced worse outcomes compared to patients hospitalized with COVID-19 without chronic inflammatory diseases. METHODS: Danish nationwide registers were used to establish a cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthropathy (SpA), or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (exposed), and a control cohort without these diseases (unexposed) between March 1, 2020, and October 31, 2020. We compared median length of hospital stay, used median regression models to estimate crude and adjusted differences. When estimating crude and adjusted odds ratio (OR) for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and mechanical ventilation, in-hospital death, 14-day and 30-day mortality, we used logistic regression models. RESULTS: We identified 132 patients with COVID-19 and IBD, RA, SpA, or PsA, and 2811 unexposed admitted to hospital with COVID-19. There were no differences between exposed and unexposed regarding length of hospital stay (6.8 days vs. 5.5 days), need for mechanical ventilation (7.6% vs. 9.4%), or CPAP (11.4% vs. 8.8%). Adjusted OR for in-hospital death was 0.71 (95% CI 0.42-1.22), death after 14-days 0.70 (95% CI 0.42-1.16), and death after 30-days 0.68 (95% CI 0.41-1.13). CONCLUSION: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and chronic inflammatory diseases did not have statistically significant increased length of hospital stay, had same need for mechanical ventilation, and CPAP. Mortality was similar in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and chronic inflammatory diseases, compared to patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and no chronic inflammatory diseases.